Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I have never found Brad Pitt attractive. I know we’re supposed to - he represents that brand of “all American” clean cut wholesome good looks that is the “ideal” for the rest of us - but there is something curiously bloated about his eyes and his lips that has always repelled me. And there is nothing going on behind his eyes. I would far rather sleep with Angeline Jolie, but that’s another story.

There’s another story buried somewhere in Brad Pitt’s curiously bloated star vehicle, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, one that is never allowed to surface, any more than any real character surfaces from under the immaculate CGI or makeup effects that propel the plot, and this applies equally to both Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett. There are hints of something about how time is fleeting and how we need to appreciate every moment of our lives. How it’s possible to have a love affair with life itself, no matter what fate hands you. How age doesn’t, or shouldn’t matter. But those are all different movies, not this one, though this one is trying desperately hard to be profound.

It’s all about how we’re meant to respond. We’re meant to think that Brad Pitt going from an octegenarian babyhood to a time-worn teenager is a brilliant acting job. He’s being touted for an Oscar, and if he wins it there’ll be no justice in this world. One of the things that is so profoundly wrong about this movie is that he doesn’t age, or change, at all under all that makeup. It’s always Brad Pitt, with that smug, curiously bloated, smile, looking out.

We’re meant to get caught up in the great Romance at the heart - the lovers living life in reverse who can only meet in the middle (where, of course, Cate Blanchett is maybe just past her prime, and has anyway had her leg crushed and can’t dance, but Brad is at the height of his gorgeosity). I would have been more moved if there had been the least bit of chemistry between the two stars. There is far more chemistry between Brad and the exquisite Tilda Swinton. The brief romance between those two gets the movie nowhere but at least provides us with a glimpse of some real feeling. The romance between Cate and Brad takes forever to get going and then is over too quickly. And the really profound and interesting period where Cate gets to look after the toddler and baby Brad is just another wasted opportunity.

We’re meant, I think, so see Benjamin’s life as some reflection of “America” itself, much as we were with Forrest Gump (no coincidence, then, that the screenwriter is the same). The movie, like Brad Pitt’s performance, is one of the front-runners for an Oscar (“run, Benjamin, run!”), and if it wins, which it could well, it will be because, like Brad Pitt, the movie reflects back to Americans how they want to see themselves. Homespun, folksey, noble, beautiful, tolerant. Empty-headed.

Apart from the failure at the core of this film, there were other annoyances. The bushman who comes out of nowhere, apparently having been an exhibit at a zoo, to stay conveniently in the all-purpose, all-race, oh-so-tolerant old-folks home where Brad is brought up, presumably there to make gnomic utterances and signal how tolerant everyone is (oh, look, there’s white Brad Pitt sitting at the back of the bus with the short black guy! I mean, wtf?).

There’s the fact that Benjamin and his ship-mates are in Russia when Pearl Harbour is bombed, without anyone apparently noticing that several years of World War 2 had been going on - IN RUSSIA !!! The setting allows some more nice CGI effects of snow and streets with neon writing in cyrillic alphabet and for Brad and Tilda Swinton to eat caviar and drink vodka. And the war, of course, allows more demonstration of how brave and patriotic and generally wonderful our American hero is. And not only Russia, but Paris and the ocean battles and all the other settings are CGI and as fake as the emotions we are supposed to feel while watching the film. And Brad refers to the exquisite Tilda Swinton as “plain.” Of course, she’s British; she couldn’t be beautiful.

There’s the fact that Cate Blanchett doesn’t walk like a dancer. I normally love Cate Blanchett, but her performance here is mannered, as if an accent and some pointy toes make up for the fact that she has no character. As she got older, her accent slipped once or twice into Katherine Hepburn. I found myself wishing for Kate to blast in and wake everyone up.

There are the heavy-handed symbols: the clock, that blasted hummingbird. (symbols of what, I’m not quite sure…) And the thunderstorm that seems to follow Brad around. And why the blazes does the movie end with Hurricane Katrina’s flood waters wooshing in??

Ultimately, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is a well-meaning, beautiful and empty-headed mess of a movie, and no doubt will make millions and win dozens of awards for its star.




( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
Dec. 31st, 2008 01:33 pm (UTC)
I loathedForrest Gump for its smug aphorisms taken as 'wisdom' and this one sounds like an even worse turnoff. I mean, when the postmodern crowd is cooing that at last a director "gets to" kill a baby on screen, I'm thinking, is THAT its best moment? Avoid.
Dec. 31st, 2008 01:50 pm (UTC)
I hated Forrest Gump, too, and found it curiously ambivalent. Didn't anybody notice what a freaking tragedy it was? Or that Gump wasn't supposed to be an entirely admirable character? Then I looked at the book and realized that a bitter social satire had been turned into a feel-good movie. Kinda like turning A Modest Proposal into a film lauding the efforts of the innovative butcher who solved Ireland's hunger problem.
Dec. 31st, 2008 02:18 pm (UTC)
Thankfully I have managed to avoid seeing Forrest Gump. Just the little clips that I've seen on film review programmes on TV was enough of a turn-off.
Dec. 31st, 2008 02:21 pm (UTC)
I've just Googled and found the original short story online. Having read it, though there was a certain poignancy to the ending, I really don't get what F. Scott Fitzgerald was trying to do with the story. I wonder what, if any, point he was trying to make?
Dec. 31st, 2008 06:59 pm (UTC)
Wow, thanks for the link - I hadn't read the story before seeing the movie (though lidocafe had). The only resemblance between the two is the title and the basic premise. It could have made a really interesting movie if done authentically.
Dec. 31st, 2008 01:46 pm (UTC)
Haven't seen the movie, but it sounds like it would be a Bad Idea to give an Oscar to Brad Pitt for it. It would be especially insulting an a year that includes Sean Penn as Harvey Milk and Frank Langella as Richard Nixon. Penn in particular did a brilliant job.

But we know the Academy has its issues. I'm still infuriated about Malcolm X, which deserved a raft of Oscars but wasn't nominated for any major awards.
Dec. 31st, 2008 03:46 pm (UTC)
Count me in the 'doesn't fancy Brad Pitt' camp. As a teenager, I sometimes wondered if fancying neither Brad Pitt nor Leo di Caprio meant I was a lesbian. Though I eventually realised that if I was, I'd probably be more interested in girls than I was....
Dec. 31st, 2008 10:43 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Yours are always helpful (as opposed to the ones I read in the paper!) But...

I would far rather sleep with Angeline Jolie

eeewww... She just gives me the creeps. Brad has his moments although I generally fancy older men if I'm going there...
Jan. 1st, 2009 03:07 am (UTC)
Thank you so much for this review, because now you have spared me the trouble of seeing it. I was on the fence, but the connection to the loathsome Forrest Gump movie is enough to decide me against it.
Jan. 1st, 2009 06:18 pm (UTC)
I have never found Brad Pitt attractive. I know we’re supposed to

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )


the last visible dog

Latest Month

June 2012


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Ideacodes